Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C/2015 F3 (SWAN)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of periodic comets. Consensus was to redirect. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

C/2015 F3 (SWAN)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

C/2015 F3 (SWAN) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage is from databases, blogs, twitter posts, forums, some photos and the discovery announcement in CBET, and thus fails in WP:NASTCRIT, according to which multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object are needed. C messier (talk) 10:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of periodic comets. There are a pair of discovery bulletins and it is mentioned briefly in Combi et al. (2021), but I don't see significant coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 13:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect per Praemonitus. There's one paper by Sekanina & Kracht (2016) and another ATel publication by Ferrin & Penuelas (2021) which both mention C/2015 F3 being part of a possible orbital grouping with disintegrated comets C/1988 A1 and C/1996 Q1, but other than that the coverage is limited. The disintegrated comet trio is interesting but is only worthy of a footnote to some broader topic like asteroid pair (that article needs work by the way, I'd appreciate it!). Nrco0e (talk) 06:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.